EP480: Payment Integrity Meets Health System Boasts, Such as Our Rates Are 2x Medicare, With Kimberly Carleson
June 26, 2025
480
32:06

EP480: Payment Integrity Meets Health System Boasts, Such as Our Rates Are 2x Medicare, With Kimberly Carleson

You know that episode from this spring with Eric Bricker, MD (EP472) about stop-loss provisions as a way for some hospitals so inclined to make more money without (technically, at least) raising rates—like, they can substantially increase the overall revenue from plan sponsors (the ones not paying attention, at least) while still able to claim they are net-net 0% increase or are very much still 2x Medicare, for example?

For a full transcript of this episode, click here.

If you enjoy this podcast, be sure to subscribe to the free weekly newsletter to be a member of the Relentless Tribe.

Well, today we stumble on a few more strategies to do the same thing in the show today with Kimberly Carleson. So, spoiler alert.

Now look, all this matters. It big-time matters. Anything that has to do with health systems and their billing of plan sponsors matters because as we have heard from multiple guests multiple times—the shows with Shawn Gremminger (EP448); Cora Opsahl (EP452); Claire Brockbank (EP453); Marilyn Bartlett, CPA, CGMA, CMA, CFM (EP450), to name a few—we have heard over and over again that usually almost 50% of plan sponsor costs have something to do with members going into the hospital and/or getting care somewhere that is under a hospital’s umbrella. Fifty percent!

And today we learn that up to 80% of hospital bills may contain some error, with 25% to 30% of those errors being significant. I just asked AI, and it said that approximately 5% to 10% of total hospital spend by plan sponsors might be attributable to billing inaccuracies or excessive charges.

My guest today, as I have mentioned twice already, Kimberly Carleson also mentions a few stats about just the magnitude of some of these mistakes. I mean, 5% to 10% of 50% of total spend is a lot of money.

Okay, so let’s discuss what we discuss today, Kimberly Carleson and I. We start out kind of digging into the where, why, and how many of these errors come to be. Then we talk about some advice for those who work at health systems who may be interested, for real, in redressing some of the stuff that we discuss.

And this whole conversation—and also Kimberly’s advice for health system leaders—is particularly relevant for anybody looking to do direct contracting with plan sponsors, of course, because … yeah, with a carrier in the middle of some of this stuff, it might not be entirely clear to many plan sponsors the magnitude or the member impact of these billing mistakes. However, in a direct contract? Yeah, expect eyes on. So, it certainly would make good sense to get ahead of some of this stuff as, I don’t know, I know nothing really.

But after talking to Kimberly and after talking with Dawn Cornelis (EP285) a few years ago, for sure, some of this stuff can be chalked off to weird complexities and not repeatable kinds of excusable mistakes. But a good deal of it kind of seems like—how shall I say this?—preventable. It seems to fall into a category of “Why is this happening?” and it’s pretty darn obvious it’s a problem, and yet it still persists.

Where this conversation heads next is getting into advice for plan sponsors, which I will summarize for your convenience right now and maybe add a couple of supplementary points.

Advice for plan sponsors that comes up in this conversation with Kimberly Carleson, number one (and this is a biggie): Have a third-party audit of claims. The point comes out pretty clearly in this show, but in that earlier episode I mentioned, the one with Dawn Cornelis, it also, this point comes out just as strongly.

And right now in the time-space continuum in 2025—I don’t know how you could even argue with it—get a third party to audit your claims who isn’t owned by the same company as your ASO (administrative services only) or TPA (third-party administrator) or whoever is processing the claims.

Julie Selesnick was on the pod last spring (EP428), and in that episode, she says, Look, it is the very definition of a conflict of interest if you, as a fiduciary, hire somebody and expect them to accurately audit themselves.

On this exact same topic in that recent Take Two episode with Justin Leader (EP433) about “The Mystery of the Weekly Claims Wire,” he talks about an example where a TPA was using a branch of their own company to audit basically their own claims, and they found $21,000 in errors.

This wasn’t even enough to cover the fee for finding those errors, which, in this case, was $25,000, right? They spent $25,000 to find $21,000 total. Meanwhile, the employer, they then got a third party in the mix who found all the actual errors; and it summed up to 20 times that. The third-party auditor found over $400,000 in errors that they then recouped for the plan sponsor.

So, yeah, first piece of advice for plan sponsors: Don’t do that. Get a different payment integrity vendor. You need somebody else to audit claims other than the person who is doing the claims.

Second piece of advice that comes up in the conversation that follows with Kimberly Carleson … I’m just gonna give you the advice, but you need to listen to the show to get the real full gist of it: contract amendments that the TPA or ASO or health plan that they cannot negotiate to pay for charges that are not legally billable. Right. And this one is interesting for more than just payment integrity purposes. I’d say it’s also interesting for direct contracting purposes and for TPA RFPs (requests for proposal).

Again, Kimberly and I talk about this at some length; and the whole thing just reminded me of something that I had seen Cristin Dickerson, MD, write. She wrote, “It is not just about what percentage of Medicare is paid. It’s about the codes charged. While an imaging center may charge one or two codes for an exam, I see hospitals charging eight codes. Those eight codes, even paid at 200% of Medicare, are ridiculous.”

This is just also, if you start thinking about it, why you gotta watch it with those RBP (reference-based pricing) contracts. And Dr. Dickerson gives a really good example of even if you have an expert who limits code payments to some agreed-upon amount, there are many cases where that just doesn’t work and hospital billing systems are able to bypass the controls.

Now, what I just said is a little wonky. If you didn’t understand it, do listen to the pod and then come back and you will totally understand it. But, yeah, bottom line, don’t accidentally agree to pay for stuff that should be free or shouldn’t be billed for in the first place as per the law. That is piece of advice two that comes up in the conversation that follows.

And then piece of advice three is know your rights as a plan sponsor. There is the CAA, the Consolidated Appropriations Act. There is the no gag clauses rules. Plan sponsors have an absolute right to the itemized bill, and they don’t have to pay until they get one and it is deemed clean.

Plan sponsors have a right to the hospital contracts the TPA/ASO/health plan has negotiated. And look, having a right and actually getting those rates, which some deem a trade secret, are two different things. So, it is increasingly up to the plan sponsor to run a clean RFP (request for proposal) using best practices like Claire Brockbank talked about in that episode (EP453) from last fall.

If an RFP bidder clearly admits they don’t have transparent business processes or they have all kinds of trade secrets that impede your access to transparent information, and if they don’t seem to be so inclined to change, then it’s on us, really, to exclude them from the RFP if they don’t meet the terms.

Ann Lewandowski talked about this a little bit in the whistleblower episode (EP476), just how the Department of Labor definitely excuses ERISA plans during a contract period who are using a vendor who, it turns out, is not doing things as per ERISA requirements.

But that leeway ends at contract renewal.

My guest today, as aforementioned, is Kimberly Carleson. She is the CEO of US Beacon, where the mission is to meticulously review and optimize medical bills.

Also mentioned in this episode are Eric Bricker, MD; Shawn Gremminger; Cora Opsahl; Claire Brockbank; Marilyn Bartlett, CPA, CGMA, CMA, CFM; Dawn Cornelis; Julie Selesnick; Justin Leader; Cristin Dickerson, MD; Ann Lewandowski; US Beacon; Keith Passwater; Havarti Risk; Erik Davis; Autumn Yongchu; and Tom Nash. 

You can learn more at us-beacon.com and by following Kimberly on LinkedIn.

Kimberly Carleson is the founder and CEO of US Beacon, a nationally recognized medical claims integrity review company that protects the financial interests of self-funded health plans and their members. Her journey into healthcare reform began from a deeply personal place. When her husband was diagnosed with stage IV cancer, Kimberly became immersed in the realities of medical billing and quickly noticed something alarming: Nearly every claim they received contained questionable charges.

Determined to uncover the truth and advocate for patients like her husband, Kimberly began to dig into the fine print, line by line. What started as a personal mission turned into a professional calling. She launched US Beacon with one goal: to ensure medical claims are compliant, transparent, and accurate before they’re paid.

Under her leadership, US Beacon has grown into a trusted, independent firm that uses CMS guidelines, NUBC standards, and nationally accepted coding regulations to identify ineligible charges, billing irregularities, and waste that most hospitals use for billing guidelines. The company works exclusively for the plan, not the provider or insurer, and maintains its independence, free from private equity or carrier influence.

Today, Kimberly is a respected voice in healthcare cost containment, known for her relentless pursuit of fairness, transparency, and compliance. With a strong commitment to fiduciary duty and patient advocacy, Kimberly continues to lead US Beacon with the same purpose that started it all: fighting for what is right—one claim at a time.

08:36 What’s the magnitude of the lack of payment integrity within healthcare?

12:11 EP285 with Dawn Cornelis.

12:46 How is lack of coordination a main culprit of lack of payment integrity?

13:42 How does reading the records reveal whether health plans are being overcharged?

15:43 A real-world example of how reviewing the charges can drastically reduce your healthcare costs.

18:32 Do you have a right to a review of your claim?

19:37 EP370 with Erik Davis and Autumn Yongchu.

22:08 How can contracts contradict what can legally be charged?

23:46 EP472 with Eric Bricker, MD.

25:04 How can hospitals update their billing to have better payment integrity?

28:44 Advice for hospital executives and their finance teams.

29:03 Advice for plan sponsors.

Recent past interviews:

Click a guest’s name for their latest RHV episode!

Ann Lewandowski (Summer Shorts), Andreas Mang and Jon Camire (EP479), Justin Leader (Take Two: EP433), Andreas Mang and Jon Camire (EP478), Stacey Richter (EP477), Charles Green (Bonus Episode), Ann Lewandowski, Peter Hayes, Yashaswini Singh, Dr Kenny Cole, Dr Eric Bricker

 


00:00:00
Episode 480.

00:00:02
" Payment Integrity Meets Health System Boasts, Such as Our Rates

00:00:08
Are 2x Medicare, and Carriers Who Also Have Medicare Advantage

00:00:12
Contracts." Today I speak with Kimberly

00:00:17
Carleson.

00:00:24
American Healthcare Entrepreneurs and Executives, You Want to Know, Talking.

00:00:30
Relentlessly Seeking Value.

00:00:32
You know that episode from this spring with Eric Bricker about stop-loss

00:00:36
provisions as a way for some hospitals so inclined to make more money without

00:00:41
technically at least raising rates like they can substantially increase the

00:00:46
overall revenue from plan sponsors, the ones not paying attention at

00:00:50
least, while still able to claim they are net net 0% increase or are very

00:00:55
much still 2x Medicare, for example.

00:00:58
Well, today we stumble on a few more strategies to do the same thing in

00:01:03
the show today with Kimberly Carleson.

00:01:05
So spoiler alert.

00:01:07
Now look, all this matters.

00:01:09
It big time matters.

00:01:11
Anything that has to do with health systems and their billing of plan

00:01:14
sponsors matters because as we have heard from multiple guests multiple

00:01:18
times, the shows with Shawn Gremminger, Cora Opsahl, Claire Brockbank,

00:01:22
Marilyn Bartlett, to name a few.

00:01:24
We have heard over and over again that usually almost 50% of plan

00:01:29
sponsor costs have something to do with members going into the hospital

00:01:34
and or getting care somewhere that is under a hospital's umbrella.

00:01:38
50%.

00:01:39
And today we learn that up to 80% of hospital bills may contain

00:01:43
some error with 25 to 30% of those errors being significant.

00:01:48
I just asked AI and it said that approximately five to 10% of total

00:01:53
hospital spend by plan sponsors might be attributable to billing

00:01:56
inaccuracies or excessive charges.

00:01:58
My guest today, as I have mentioned twice already, Kimberly Carleson also

00:02:02
mentions a few stats about just the magnitude of some of these mistakes.

00:02:07
I mean, five to 10% of 50% of total spend, is a lot of money.

00:02:11
Okay, so let's discuss what we discuss today, Kimberly Carleson and I. We start

00:02:16
out kind of digging into the where, why, and how many of these errors come to be.

00:02:22
Then we talk about some advice for those who work at health systems

00:02:26
who may be interested for real in redressing some of the stuff that we

00:02:30
discuss and this whole conversation.

00:02:32
And also Kimberly's advice for health system leaders is particularly relevant

00:02:36
for anybody looking to do direct contracting with plan sponsors, of course.

00:02:39
Because yeah, with a carrier in the middle of some of this stuff, it might

00:02:43
not be entirely clear to many plan sponsors, the magnitude or the member

00:02:48
impact of these billing mistakes.

00:02:51
However, in a direct contract, yeah, expect eyes on, so it

00:02:55
certainly would make good sense to get ahead of some of this stuff.

00:02:58
As I don't know, I know nothing really, but after talking to Kimberly and after

00:03:01
talking with Dawn Cornelis a few years ago, for sure, some of this stuff can

00:03:06
be chalked off to weird complexities and not repeatable kinds of excusable

00:03:10
mistakes, but a good deal of it kind of seems like, how shall I say this?

00:03:15
Preventable.

00:03:15
It seems to fall into a category of why is this happening and

00:03:19
it's pretty darn obvious it's a problem, and yet it still persists.

00:03:22
Where this conversation heads next is getting into advice for plan

00:03:25
sponsors, which I will summarize for your convenience right now, and maybe

00:03:30
add a couple of supplementary points.

00:03:33
Advice for plan sponsors that comes up in this conversation with Kimberly Carleson,

00:03:38
number one, and this is a biggie, have a third party audit of claims.

00:03:42
The point comes out pretty clearly in this show, but in that earlier

00:03:45
episode I mentioned the one with Dawn Cornelis it also, this

00:03:48
point comes out just as strongly.

00:03:50
And right now in the timespace continuum in 2025, I don't know how you could

00:03:55
even argue with it, get a third party to audit your claims, who isn't owned

00:03:59
by the same company as your ASO or TPA or whoever is processing the claims.

00:04:04
Julie Selesnick was on the pod last spring and in that episode she says,

00:04:08
Look, it is the very definition of a conflict of interest if you as a

00:04:12
fiduciary hire somebody and expect them to accurately audit themselves.

00:04:16
On this exact same topic in that recent Take Two episode with Justin Leader

00:04:21
about The Mystery of the Weekly Claims Wire, he talks about an example where

00:04:26
a TPA was using a branch of their own company to audit basically their own

00:04:30
claims, and they found $21 in errors.

00:04:34
This wasn't even enough to cover the fee for finding those errors, which

00:04:37
in this case was $25, right?

00:04:39
They spent $25 to find $21 total . Meanwhile, the employer, they then got

00:04:47
a third party in the mix who found all the actual errors, and it summed up to

00:04:52
20 times that the third party auditor found over $400 in errors that they

00:04:58
then recouped for the plan sponsor.

00:05:00
So yeah, first piece of advice for plan sponsors.

00:05:03
Don't do that.

00:05:03
Get a different payment integrity vendor.

00:05:06
You need somebody else to audit claims other than the

00:05:08
person who is doing the claims.

00:05:11
Second piece of advice that comes up in the conversation that follows with

00:05:14
Kimberly Carleson, I'm just gonna give you the advice, but you need to listen to

00:05:18
the show to get the real full gist of it.

00:05:21
Contract amendments that the TPA or ASO or health plan that they

00:05:25
cannot negotiate to pay for charges that are not legally billable.

00:05:31
Right.

00:05:32
And this one is interesting for more than just payment integrity purposes.

00:05:37
I'd say it's also interesting for direct contracting purposes and for TPA RFPs.

00:05:42
Again, Kimberly and I talk about this at some length, and the whole thing

00:05:46
just reminded me of something that I had seen Dr. Cristin Dickerson write,

00:05:51
she wrote, "It is not just about what percentage of Medicare is paid.

00:05:56
It's about the codes charged.

00:05:59
While an imaging center may charge one or two codes for an exam, I

00:06:02
see hospitals charging eight codes.

00:06:05
Those eight codes even paid at 200% of Medicare are ridiculous."

00:06:09
This is just also, if you start thinking about it, why you gotta

00:06:12
watch it with those RBP contracts.

00:06:14
And, Dr. Dickerson gives a really good example of even if you have an expert who

00:06:20
limits code payments to some agreed upon amount, there are many cases where that

00:06:25
just doesn't work and hospital billing systems are able to bypass the controls.

00:06:31
Now, what I just said is a little wonky.

00:06:34
If you didn't understand it, do listen to the pod and then come back

00:06:38
and you will totally understand it.

00:06:40
But yeah, bottom line, don't accidentally agree to pay for stuff that should

00:06:44
be free or shouldn't be billed for in the first place as per the law.

00:06:48
That is piece of advice two that comes up in the conversation that follows.

00:06:52
And then piece of advice three is know your rights as a plan sponsor.

00:06:57
There is the CAA, the Consolidated Appropriations Act.

00:07:00
There is the no gag clauses rules.

00:07:03
Plan sponsors have an absolute right to the itemized bill and they don't

00:07:08
have to pay until they get one.

00:07:10
And it is deemed clean.

00:07:11
Plan sponsors have a right to the hospital contracts.

00:07:14
The TPA/ASO/health plan has negotiated.

00:07:18
And look, having a right and actually getting those rates which some deem a

00:07:22
trade secret are two different things.

00:07:24
So it is increasingly up to the plan sponsor to run a clean RFP, request

00:07:29
for proposal, using best practices like Claire Brockbank talked about

00:07:33
in that episode from last fall.

00:07:34
If an RFP bidder clearly admits they don't have transparent business processes,

00:07:40
or they have all kinds of trade secrets that impede your access to transparent

00:07:45
information, and if they don't seem to be so inclined to change, then

00:07:48
it's on us really to exclude them from the RFP if they don't meet the terms.

00:07:53
Ann Lewandowski talked about this a little bit in the whistleblower episode

00:07:58
from a few months ago, just how the Department of Labor definitely excuses

00:08:03
ERISA plans during a contract period who are using a vendor who it turns out is not

00:08:09
doing things as per ERISA requirements.

00:08:13
But that leeway ends at contract renewal.

00:08:16
My guest today as aforementioned is Kimberly Carleson.

00:08:19
She is the CEO of US Beacon, where the mission is to meticulously

00:08:24
review and optimize medical bills.

00:08:27
My name is Stacey Richter.

00:08:28
This podcast is sponsored by Aventria Health Group.

00:08:31
Kimberly Carleson, welcome to Relentless Health Value.

00:08:33
It's a pleasure being here.

00:08:35
Thank you for having me.

00:08:36
What's the magnitude of the issues here?

00:08:39
You, you know, just obviously for the members themselves, this can

00:08:43
be a catastrophic situation, but if I'm thinking about this from

00:08:47
the standpoint of the plan sponsor, what can you tell me about, you

00:08:51
know, if I said, eh, is it worth it?

00:08:52
What would you say?

00:08:54
For an example, in a review from one client we have, there was 55 members.

00:08:59
There's a $600 million medical spend.

00:09:02
We had identified 64 million in excessive charges.

00:09:07
That's more than 10% of the total spend, and that was

00:09:11
just claims $10 and above.

00:09:14
A lot of us sit in chairs and it's just like a million here, but $64 million.

00:09:19
That's a lot of money.

00:09:22
A lot of money.

00:09:22
And that was in one year?

00:09:23
One year.

00:09:23
Mm-hmm.

00:09:24
So, what are the most prominent ways that a health system, a hospital, may wind

00:09:30
up messing up a bill and overcharging?

00:09:35
So I think you have documentation, delays or gaps.

00:09:39
Physicians and clinicians may, they work under tight constraints, so

00:09:42
documentation is delayed or incomplete.

00:09:45
Billing teams may make assumptions or apply standard charge protocols that don't

00:09:49
reflect what actually occurred, and then you've got, um, your manual data injuries

00:09:54
or your fat fingers that accidentally hit a button that they didn't mean to.

00:09:59
It pulls the wrong code altogether, and so you're charged extra.

00:10:03
You've got unbundling services where some procedures may be billed in a

00:10:06
bundled charge, and then on the itemized statement, they're billed separately.

00:10:10
They pull out every single charge from that bundled charge.

00:10:14
You have upcoding.

00:10:15
Codes are sometimes assigned to a higher level of complexity then what's

00:10:19
medically necessary or documented?

00:10:21
There's duplicate billing charging for, uh, non FDA approved items.

00:10:25
We had a pacemaker one time that was non FDA approved, and you can't

00:10:28
charge for that under CMS guidelines.

00:10:30
And then you've got inflated markups on routine items, time-based charges

00:10:36
without time documentations like in ORs or recovery room, sometimes billing

00:10:41
services that weren't even rendered.

00:10:42
And then I think you have the lack of coordination between departments because

00:10:45
there's such a demand and the hospital systems are so packed and understaffed

00:10:52
that there's lack of coordination.

00:10:54
You have misuse of revenue codes, emergency room coding, details

00:10:58
that are not properly done, and then repetitive charges on multiple

00:11:02
days that they're in the hospital.

00:11:04
So just kind of summing up what you, you said there, it sounds like.

00:11:07
I think my big takeaway from everything you just said is that it could be one of

00:11:11
many ways that, that this could happen.

00:11:14
I mean, it could.

00:11:14
That's just a few.

00:11:15
Yeah.

00:11:15
Yeah.

00:11:16
It was a pretty, pretty comprehensive list.

00:11:18
If that was just a couple of 'em, um, I'm getting the drift.

00:11:22
Hi, I am Keith Passwater, CEO of Havarti Risk.

00:11:25
As a healthcare actuary, I can sometimes get deep into the weeds

00:11:27
of the math behind healthcare.

00:11:29
Maybe you experience that as well, getting hyper-focused

00:11:31
to your corner of healthcare.

00:11:33
That's why I so appreciate Relentless Health Value.

00:11:36
Listen to the conversations reminds me that our healthcare system is huge, but

00:11:39
we're ultimately here for the patients.

00:11:41
If you wanna make a difference in healthcare, don't miss an episode

00:11:44
of Relentless Health Value, and I really encourage you to follow the

00:11:47
podcast on Apple Podcast or Spotify.

00:11:49
And please leave a review.

00:11:51
Thanks for listening.

00:11:53
So, as you said, it could be just simply fat fingers, just somebody messed up.

00:11:58
It could be, it sounds like a failure to communicate adequately, maybe

00:12:03
between like the clinical team and the billing team, so somebody makes

00:12:08
an assumption that was not correct.

00:12:11
The bundling errors we had Dawn Cornelis on several years ago, and this is one

00:12:16
of the things that she talked about a lot, where, you know, if you're charging

00:12:19
a bundled price, you can't then go back and charge for the individual services

00:12:22
that are part of that bundle also.

00:12:25
You can just have duplicate billing, be it just a duplicate billing.

00:12:29
Or it could be if a, if it's an inpatient who's in the hospital for multiple

00:12:32
days, they wind up charging for the same thing multiple days in a row.

00:12:37
That should be one, as you said, time-based billing, you know, something

00:12:40
was for like in an OR whatever, and that was not necessarily documented

00:12:44
or is inaccurate in some way.

00:12:46
I mean, I really don't think it's intentional.

00:12:48
I think it's just sometimes I don't.

00:12:50
Most of the time, I don't think it is, but it's just a lack of

00:12:52
coordination between departments and just in a, everyone's in a hurry.

00:12:56
Hospitals are large, really complicated entities with lots of stuff going

00:13:01
on and lots of different people.

00:13:03
And two, they change systems so much.

00:13:05
And then I'm sure also from the clinical side, like as a clinician,

00:13:09
you might not even realize what's being done with what you're typing in.

00:13:12
Like you're trying to document what happened in the clinical visit and

00:13:16
somebody else is gonna take that information and do other things with

00:13:19
it, that now it's outside of your purview, what winds up happening

00:13:23
down that particular vector stream.

00:13:26
But before, before we get, I definitely wanna ask you for some representative

00:13:32
examples, maybe of all of this coming together in a way that is worthy

00:13:37
of talking about on this podcast.

00:13:39
But before we get there, let, let me ask you something.

00:13:42
How do you know this?

00:13:44
Like, are you actually talking to members and they say, no,

00:13:49
I didn't have that in the ER.

00:13:50
Like, or whatever you know.

00:13:52
Well, the coding guidelines, I mean, if you know your coding and

00:13:55
you've been doing it long enough, you're aware of what can be charged.

00:13:59
You're aware of someone goes into the ER for a stitch because

00:14:05
they fell and bumped their head.

00:14:07
They're not a level four ER visit.

00:14:09
They're a One or two, you know, so you know from the medical

00:14:13
records that this charge cannot be escalated up to a level four.

00:14:18
So you just read the records.

00:14:19
So it's not just, you know, they always say, you know, absolutely

00:14:22
go and get an itemized bill.

00:14:24
Like we've had Marshall Allen on the, like, you can practically talk to no

00:14:28
one who won't tell you that the first thing that to do here with any sort

00:14:32
of billing conundrum of almost any kind is to go get that itemized bill.

00:14:36
So can you just look at that itemized bill and see that what the severity

00:14:43
is, or make some assumptions there?

00:14:44
I mean, some of the stuff that you were talking about, definitely,

00:14:47
like if it's a duplicate charge or whatever, if you get the itemized

00:14:50
bill, you would be able to tell.

00:14:51
But some of the stuff relative to the severity of it, like wouldn't they just

00:14:54
code that it was a level four trauma and not write down that it was one stitch.

00:14:59
Right?

00:14:59
You can absolutely see it from the itemized bill.

00:15:02
The itemized bill's gonna tell you if they had Tylenol or if they had codeine.

00:15:06
You know, it's going to tell you and you're gonna be able to see exactly

00:15:10
what that patient went through at the time they were in the hospital.

00:15:13
Let me just ask you for a couple of different examples here, and one of the

00:15:16
reasons why I'm for sure digging in on this is just because we talk a lot on

00:15:22
this podcast about how much plan sponsors tend to spend on hospital charges.

00:15:29
You gave an example of a plan sponsor where almost 10% of charges were

00:15:36
inaccurate and could be recouped.

00:15:38
So because the dollars are so big, errors can be huge.

00:15:43
Can you just maybe run through just some real world examples of a situation

00:15:48
that happened, just which may give listeners a little bit of context here.

00:15:51
We had a lung transplant and it was out of network, but it was a single

00:15:55
case agreement and it was 1.5 million was how much they were charging.

00:16:00
We were reviewing it and they charged $676 for the organ.

00:16:06
You can't charge that for the organ.

00:16:08
You have to charge 56.

00:16:10
That's all, that is allowed by law.

00:16:12
So once we got done with that bill, it went from 1.5 million to 290,

00:16:17
and that's just ineligible charges.

00:16:19
We just eliminate what legally should not be there.

00:16:23
From CMS guidelines, NCCI edits, NUBC, AMA, Social Security Act, all of those

00:16:29
go into play with what we look at and it's just what legally is not owed.

00:16:34
So someone was trying to charge $600 less for something that they

00:16:39
should have charged 50 something.

00:16:40
So it's like 10, 12 times what was allowable.

00:16:44
Yes.

00:16:45
So it's easy to see how these charges can just add up and it's, it was

00:16:49
probably like their charge, master charge or whatever, and it almost

00:16:51
sounds like the re-pricer like failed to notice this or whatever happened.

00:16:56
But that bill made it all the way through the gauntlet and it was

00:17:01
ready to be paid or already paid.

00:17:04
I've seen implants be up to $30 when they should have cost 6.

00:17:08
IV hydration therapy.

00:17:10
That is a big one.

00:17:11
You can't charge for saline in an IV that goes within the hospital charge.

00:17:16
Operating room charges.

00:17:17
I even saw the other day cutting a pill, a pill cutter.

00:17:21
They charge like $20.

00:17:22
That's just slicing the pill in half.

00:17:25
Your recovery room charges, they don't document the hours, so that

00:17:30
can be extremely overcharged.

00:17:32
Respiratory therapy services, if they're billed daily, it often lacks medical

00:17:36
necessity or for provider information.

00:17:39
You've got, oh, venina puncture when they put a needle into your arm.

00:17:43
They can't charge you for the push of the needle, and they do that a lot.

00:17:47
Uh, the EKGs are well known for duplicate billing and charging excessively when they

00:17:53
should be within the bundled code itself.

00:17:55
Sterilization, I've seen it 19 times on a bill separated out, but sterilization

00:18:01
is bundled in a code within the surgery.

00:18:04
So that should never be separated.

00:18:06
Over the counter medication, that's not billable.

00:18:08
It's not legally billable.

00:18:09
You can't charge for Tylenol.

00:18:11
Implant components.

00:18:12
That's a huge one.

00:18:14
They're all bundled into a code.

00:18:15
You can't charge for each screw.

00:18:17
Again, as we all know, and I think your examples indicate why it's so

00:18:21
important to get the itemized bill

00:18:24
Absolutely every time.

00:18:25
You have to go back and ask for the itemized and sometimes

00:18:28
they don't send it then.

00:18:29
You have to, it's very difficult to get at times.

00:18:32
As a plan sponsor, do I have a legal right to get the itemized

00:18:36
bill or how does this work?

00:18:37
Absolutely.

00:18:38
You have a legal right under ERISA, the Consolidate Appropriations Act.

00:18:41
You have a right to review your documents, itemized statement UB-04 before it's paid.

00:18:47
But if they delay long enough, now all of a sudden my member's getting nasty grams.

00:18:51
Like, how do you go about getting what you need while, meanwhile

00:18:56
there's all this other, you know, I, I don't think the process probably

00:18:59
stopped that the, the hospital just 'cause this is going on on the side.

00:19:03
Legally by law allowed to have a review of your claim and you want a clean...

00:19:08
Once you turn in a clean claim, then the 30 days for payment can go, the

00:19:12
clock can start ticking for payment.

00:19:13
We hound them with fax, emails, calling them in order to

00:19:19
get that itemized statement.

00:19:19
Most of the time a lot of hospitals are compliant.

00:19:22
Most are, we know the ones that aren't.

00:19:24
So how the process typically works is the plan sponsor is gonna

00:19:28
go ask for the itemized bill.

00:19:31
They may turn around and send you something else, like there's this UB-04

00:19:36
that gets brought up sometimes Autumn Yongchu talked about this just kind of

00:19:40
general idea where there's itemized bills and then there's other documents that

00:19:44
at the end of the day still are roll-ups that the hospital may respond with, which

00:19:48
actually do not give enough information if you're trying to do a bill review.

00:19:52
So then you gotta turn around and say, no, no, no, no, no.

00:19:55
I want the actual itemized bill.

00:19:57
And you can cite the precedents for getting it.

00:20:00
Do they have like a a period of time that they must send the itemized bill

00:20:05
over in, or do you just say, you know, we ain't gonna pay it until you get me the

00:20:09
itemized bill and therefore it's on them to choose how long they're gonna delay.

00:20:13
Each state is different.

00:20:14
We state those laws and we state how many days they have and the date.

00:20:18
Usually you would have the allowable amounts, send it

00:20:21
back, and that's what you pay.

00:20:23
And typically, very few appeals when you do it right, when you,

00:20:26
what's legally owed is paid.

00:20:29
So if a plan sponsor is up on the regs and, and knows how much, what,

00:20:33
you know, what the actual contractual allowable amounts are and a health

00:20:39
system is told, look, this is the drill.

00:20:41
This is what these charges should have been.

00:20:43
Then they're not like in the meantime fighting with you while they're sending

00:20:47
the member collection notices about the higher amount or something like that.

00:20:51
Right.

00:20:51
And so most don't allow that.

00:20:54
As a bill re reviewer, you let 'em know how, why you have

00:20:57
did not allow those charges.

00:20:59
Give them the chapter number, give 'em the page number, whatever you have to do.

00:21:02
I just got one the other day and I have to send back the chapter number

00:21:05
of CMS guidelines, the page number of why this cannot be charged.

00:21:10
But if you're a plan sponsor, what?

00:21:11
What does CMS have to do with this?

00:21:13
Those are the guidelines for billing.

00:21:14
The CMS guidelines is what you go off of the CPT codes.

00:21:18
Mm-hmm.

00:21:18
From the CMS, AMA, NCCI, all of those go into how much you're

00:21:23
legally and contractually owe.

00:21:25
Even as an ERISA plan?

00:21:26
Yes, even as an ERISA plan.

00:21:28
You cannot add the CPT code with another CPT code that is supposed

00:21:33
to be all in the bundled CPT code.

00:21:35
Do you understand?

00:21:36
You can't break certain CPT codes out if they're bundled into one.

00:21:40
These are CMS regs.

00:21:41
Like if you're charging a bundle payment, you can't just turn around

00:21:44
and charge all the things that are actually part of the bundle also.

00:21:47
There are other things, like you can't charge for sterilization multiple times.

00:21:51
You can't charge for pill splitting, you can't charge for venipuncture, right?

00:21:55
Like these are all sort of part and parcel to what constitutes a code.

00:21:59
There's federal guidelines for coding.

00:22:01
Well, it's just interesting to me that some things do have those caps

00:22:05
on them, like 60k for an organ.

00:22:07
Well, and you know too, if a network has a contracted rate or a

00:22:11
negotiated rate, there's nothing you can do about what is being charged.

00:22:15
If their contract says that they can charge for robotics, then

00:22:19
they can charge for robotics.

00:22:21
And you're not really allowed to charge for robotics because that's

00:22:24
integral to the hospital equipment.

00:22:26
Billing can be so confusing, and I can understand how hospitals are perplexed

00:22:30
when getting them out or making mistakes because it is very confusing and depending

00:22:34
on the provider and plan you have.

00:22:36
Also, are you saying that the lung transplant that wound up costing,

00:22:40
you know, they were charging 600 for a lung when it should

00:22:43
have been 50 for the lung.

00:22:47
Are you saying that sometimes, the carrier, whoever, there's another

00:22:52
contract that would override that, those CMS guidelines.

00:22:55
Right, so it could have been 600k if there there was a second agreement between

00:23:03
whoever negotiated with the hospital.

00:23:04
Absolutely.

00:23:05
You're saying is in the absence of that, like if there is no contractually agreed

00:23:10
upon number that was repriced in there or there's no line item for something,

00:23:16
then CMS guidelines our enforce.

00:23:20
Yes.

00:23:20
For example, we were able to get a hold of a contract and they

00:23:23
got to pay 29 for robotics.

00:23:25
Well, robotics is not legally billable, but it's in the

00:23:28
contract, so, the 29 stands.

00:23:31
One of the things that does become clear is that there are incentives that

00:23:35
carriers have, which may not always be aligned with their commercial customers,

00:23:43
and this almost seems like another one of them where if the carriers trying

00:23:48
to figure out how to get leverage to have a lower Medicare Advantage rate

00:23:53
similarly to how they may do some of the stuff that we talked about

00:23:57
in the show with Dr. Eric Bricker.

00:23:58
They also could do this like, all right, well, we're gonna add

00:24:01
another line item for robotics.

00:24:03
We're gonna add another line item.

00:24:04
So things that they were not previously able to charge for it's

00:24:09
like the carrier can be like, all right, well, we'll do this for you.

00:24:12
Now all of a sudden, the hospital can increase their charges for things in

00:24:16
ways that don't necessarily show up.

00:24:18
And I'm, I'm saying this a little blindly, and if anybody knows the

00:24:21
right answer, certainly let me know.

00:24:23
But that's not gonna impact their, you know, their net net

00:24:26
percent over Medicare, right?

00:24:28
Like they could still say, oh, we're 200% of Medicare overall, or

00:24:31
whatever it is, because now they're charging for things that they

00:24:34
previously weren't able to charge for.

00:24:37
But maybe it's not 200% of Medicare.

00:24:39
It should have been zero.

00:24:40
It's very complex.

00:24:42
When we review claims, we see in network 30% of ineligible charges,

00:24:48
and that's after the discount.

00:24:50
Out of network we find 70% and above.

00:24:53
And, so that is a significant amount of overspend in claims and that

00:24:58
just trickles down to increasing your premiums, everything that

00:25:02
would go within a self-insured plan.

00:25:04
So what's your advice for, for hospitals?

00:25:06
We've got lots of hospitals who would love to direct contract

00:25:09
or work with plan sponsors.

00:25:11
How do they get their billing up to the task?

00:25:14
Because, you'd think that any plan sponsor, savvy enough to direct contract,

00:25:17
would also be savvy enough to have payment integrity review, and if it's Armageddon

00:25:22
every time the plan needs to correct a wrong bill, that's not gonna be great

00:25:27
for client relations or client retention.

00:25:31
So what, what do you think hospitals need to know about all of this?

00:25:34
Let's, let's designate a point of contact for review.

00:25:37
Let's assign someone that's knowledgeable enough in compliance and billing to lead

00:25:42
you and coordinate you directly to where you can go get those itemized statements.

00:25:47
Then let's provide complete documentation without delay.

00:25:50
Let's provide the itemized statement, the UB-04, the medical records.

00:25:53
Let's be proactive about providing those when asked for not

00:25:57
continuing to prolong the process.

00:26:00
Let's respond to the audit findings with openness.

00:26:03
Let's, let's, when discrepancies are identified, nobody's

00:26:06
trying to point fingers.

00:26:08
We just wanna clean the bill so it can be paid.

00:26:10
So let's keep an open mind with it and, work with the company, review

00:26:15
company that is reviewing the claims.

00:26:18
And then I would just wish they would respect the legal rights of ERISA plans

00:26:22
and the vendors to conduct audits and not use legal threats towards anyone that is

00:26:29
trying to do the right thing to review the statements, to review the claims in

00:26:34
order to fulfill their fiduciary duty.

00:26:36
So hopefully our findings would be quality improvement opportunity for hospitals.

00:26:41
There's a lot of hospital executives that listen and it sounds like what

00:26:44
you're saying is, I mean, it sounds reasonable to me, first of all, have a

00:26:48
designated point of contact who knows who has been trained, which also could

00:26:53
eliminate the last thing that you said is like, don't threaten things,

00:26:57
which are not based on the law, right?

00:27:01
Then the second thing is when asked provide the documents, they're

00:27:05
supposed to provide the documents, so provide them, respond quickly.

00:27:09
I mean, this just seems like your average, normal customer

00:27:12
service kind of stuff here.

00:27:15
And then as you said, respect the legal right of vendors.

00:27:18
But you know, if hospitals would look at it this way, when their

00:27:21
compliance teams lean into accuracy and partnership, everyone wins.

00:27:26
It strengthens trust with payers and ensures patients and

00:27:29
plans are only charged for what they actually need to pay for.

00:27:33
And I think right now in healthcare, strengthening that trust is so important.

00:27:38
Yeah.

00:27:38
We just, we just literally did a show about the amount of distrust in the system

00:27:43
and how just the number, it's over half of patients are scared to go to the hospital.

00:27:50
They're delaying care because they're so worried that their bill is gonna

00:27:54
bankrupt them or their family.

00:27:56
You want the hospital to be paid.

00:27:57
I'm all for the hospital being paid correctly and the

00:28:01
plan paying what they owe.

00:28:03
But when you start billing for things and negotiating secret contracts with carriers

00:28:08
that involve charges that are not legally billable, that's where I have a problem.

00:28:13
So what you're trying to do is go back then and say, look, I know you and the

00:28:17
carrier cooked up a charge where you're allowed to charge for robotics, but you

00:28:20
shouldn't be charging for robotics, so we're not gonna pay you for robotics.

00:28:25
And they're coming back and saying, yeah, but I got a deal to charge for robotics.

00:28:29
Like I got paper on that.

00:28:31
Therefore, we are gonna charge for robotics.

00:28:33
Like that's when things get dicey.

00:28:35
Exactly.

00:28:36
Typically, you wouldn't mess with carrier rates, but if it's a charge that's not

00:28:40
supposed to be billable, you shouldn't negotiate a rate and to charge it.

00:28:44
So we have a few pieces of advice for hospital executives and finance teams

00:28:49
that we just went through, mainly focused on assign a point of contact to work

00:28:53
with plan sponsors or their vendors on billing questions and this point

00:28:58
of contact should know the applicable laws and is customer service oriented.

00:29:03
Now we've pivoted into advice for plan sponsors, or I'm going to pivot us there,

00:29:09
but with some amount of trepidation because I was gonna say, oh, first piece

00:29:14
of advice is to make sure that your TPA or ASO or health plan isn't doing things

00:29:19
where they get a better Medicare Advantage rate by agreeing that their commercial

00:29:23
clients can get charged for stuff that CMS says you shouldn't get charged for.

00:29:28
But now I'm hesitant because given that these are secret deals between

00:29:34
the carrier and the hospital, I am not sure how you would even know that the

00:29:39
carrier health plan has negotiated with the hospital and included things that

00:29:44
shouldn't be charged for until the plan sponsor got a bill for it, unless it's

00:29:50
somehow, I don't know, somewhere in the carrier RFP, you say something like,

00:29:55
here's a stipulation of this contract.

00:29:57
All charges excluded by CMS will remain excluded.

00:30:01
Like you actually put that in the RFP as a contract term.

00:30:04
I would think so.

00:30:05
I'm not real certain how that works, but I do know that as a plan sponsor, you

00:30:10
should, you have a right to the contracts one, and you should, before you sign,

00:30:16
look over your plan, detail your plan documents, and add in amendments or add

00:30:21
in additions that say, we will not pay for charges that are not legally billable.

00:30:27
As a plan sponsor, you stick a line in there that say, if you're not allowed to

00:30:30
charge for it, we're not paying for it.

00:30:32
We just not bill those things that aren't legally billable, and then

00:30:36
no one will have a problem with it.

00:30:38
So it would be really nice if that we could all come into compliance

00:30:41
with what's legal and what's not.

00:30:43
Okay.

00:30:43
So we talked about a couple of different things to do proactively here.

00:30:48
Is there, is there anything else?

00:30:50
I would assert your legal rights as a plan sponsor.

00:30:53
You have the right to review itemized statement UP-04.

00:30:56
You have the right to conduct pre and post payment reviews, and you have access to

00:31:00
provider contracts with the no gag clause.

00:31:02
And then I would also partner with an independent review firm.

00:31:06
If you get, if a plan tells you or a carrier tells you that they are

00:31:09
reviewing your bills and they already have someone in house that's reviewing

00:31:13
them for you, I would say I wanna bring in my own independent third party

00:31:18
that doesn't have skin in the game.

00:31:20
Recapping there, assert rights.

00:31:22
Every plan sponsor has the right to review charges to review the itemized bill.

00:31:28
Also access to the provider contracts vis-a-vis the no gag clauses.

00:31:34
These things should be available.

00:31:36
And then lastly, based on this conversation, I don't think there

00:31:39
should be any question that it should be an indie bill reviewer.

00:31:43
Kimberly Carleson, thank you so much for being on Relentless Health Value today.

00:31:46
Thank you for having me.

00:31:47
Hi, this is Tom Nash, one of the RHV team members.

00:31:50
You might recognize my voice from the podcast intro.

00:31:53
If you love the show and you wanna show us your support, please follow

00:31:57
us on your favorite podcast app.

00:31:58
Sign up for the newsletter, or maybe consider making a

00:32:00
small donation in the tip jar.

00:32:02
Thanks so much for listening.

ASO,Administrative Services Only,Audit claims,Billing Accuracy,Billing errors,CMS guidelines,ERISA,Itemized Bill,Kimberly Carleson,Medicare Advantage,TPA,Third-party administrator,Third-party audit,Transparent billing practices,UB-04,health system,

Recent Episodes

Take Two: EP438: Is It Mission and/or Margin? With John Lee, MD
July 03, 202535:5932.93 MB

Take Two: EP438: Is It Mission and/or Margin? With John Lee, MD

Listen On Your Favorite App I am so focused right now on the intersection (or lack thereof) of mission and margin, so I’m taking a second listen to this episode right now with John Lee, MD, because it is so ridiculously relevant given that I am, as stated, on a bit of a tear. For a full transcript ...

EP480: Payment Integrity Meets Health System Boasts, Such as Our Rates Are 2x Medicare, With Kimberly Carleson
June 26, 2025
480
32:0629.38 MB

EP480: Payment Integrity Meets Health System Boasts, Such as Our Rates Are 2x Medicare, With Kimberly Carleson

Listen On Your Favorite App You know that episode from this spring with Eric Bricker, MD ( EP472 ) about stop-loss provisions as a way for some hospitals so inclined to make more money without (technically, at least) raising rates—like, they can substantially increase the overall revenue from plan ...

Pharma Rebates: A Few Nuances You May Not Have Thought Of, With Ann Lewandowski—Summer Shorts
June 19, 202519:2717.81 MB

Pharma Rebates: A Few Nuances You May Not Have Thought Of, With Ann Lewandowski—Summer Shorts

Listen On Your Favorite App So much can be said about pharma rebates or, as I’m starting to call them after speaking with my guest today, Ann Lewandowski, monies received back from manufacturers or even post-sale concessions. And we get a little bit into this today why rebates is just so much lingu...

EP479: What Could Go Wrong Covering High-Cost Claimants With Stop-Loss Reinsurance? With Andreas Mang and Jon Camire
June 12, 2025
479
27:2525.09 MB

EP479: What Could Go Wrong Covering High-Cost Claimants With Stop-Loss Reinsurance? With Andreas Mang and Jon Camire

Listen On Your Favorite App This show today, for sure, it’s for plan sponsors and anyone on or about plan sponsors; but also listen if you are serving high-cost claimants some other way. Because what you’ll learn here today is some insights relative to how plan sponsors go about making sure that th...

Take Two: EP433: The Mystery of the Weekly Claims Wire, With Justin Leader
June 05, 202538:4935.53 MB

Take Two: EP433: The Mystery of the Weekly Claims Wire, With Justin Leader

Listen On Your favorite App I decided to take a second listen to this episode due to the large number of posts on LinkedIn and conversations by the likes of Peter Hayes , Jamie Greenleaf , Steve Ditto , Julie Selesnick , Chris Deacon , Darren Fogarty just about the dollars disappearing when TPAs (t...

EP478: Stop-Loss Coverage, Part 1: How It Goes Right, and How It Can Go Horribly Wrong, With Andreas Mang and Jon Camire
May 29, 2025
478
31:5829.26 MB

EP478: Stop-Loss Coverage, Part 1: How It Goes Right, and How It Can Go Horribly Wrong, With Andreas Mang and Jon Camire

Listen On Your Favorite App Hey, question for you. Can it ever actually be better for a claim to get lasered? If your knee-jerk reaction is, “Nope. No, not so much. Lasered claims are always bad,” and/or if you have no idea what I’m talking about, do continue to listen. This question gets answered....

EP477: Through Line Show: What the Tribe Thinks You Need to Know About Trust or It’s Gonna Be a Problem. Also, Why You Are Smart, With Stacey Richter
May 22, 2025
477
18:3325.47 MB

EP477: Through Line Show: What the Tribe Thinks You Need to Know About Trust or It’s Gonna Be a Problem. Also, Why You Are Smart, With Stacey Richter

Listen On Your Favorite App A couple months ago, I did my very first episode ( EP467 ) that locked down a very clear through line, a theme tying together a bunch of RHV (Relentless Health Value) episodes from earlier this year. That earlier through line was a lack of good primary care means higher ...

Listen and Follow

Sponsored by Aventria Health Group
©2025 BD Bridges LLC. All Rights Reserved.